Volume 51 (1996), 5

The aim of the paper is to show one part of Searle’s conception of intentionality in its relationship to the problem of intensionality. A short characteristics of intensionality is given, followed by the outline of Searle’s concept of intentionality and intentional states, leaving out the problems of intensionality concerning modal contexts. Finally, the autor… Čítať ďalej

The paper delas with the critique of Kant’s conception of the relation between apriority and necessity given by S. Kripke in his work Naming and Necessity. A short retrospective outline of the Kantian, resp. traditional interpretation of the above metioned realtion is offered, followed by the explication of Kripke’s argumentation against this conception.… Čítať ďalej