Skip to main content

Volume 65 (2010), 7

Papers

(Original title: Problém sebapoznania v Xenofóntovom diele Memorabilia)
Filozofia, 65 (2010), 7, 622-630.
Abstract

Many scholars suggest that one of the main differences between Xenophon’s and Plato’s portrayals of Socrates is in their emphases on the self-control the self-knowledge respectively. The aim of the paper is to examine the role the self-knowledge plays in Xenophon’s Memorabilia. In its first part Xenophon’s conception of the self-knowledge is analysed. Then it… Read more

File to download: PDF
(Original title: O kognitívnych prienikoch umenia a vedy)
Filozofia, 65 (2010), 7, 631-642.
Abstract

Cognitive overlap between art and science can be found in the processes of learning through experience. What necessarily needs to be present in these processes are not good reasons in favor of what is known or learnt, but the following features: The first feature art and science have in common is the negativity of learning processes: What a cognizer C learns… Read more

File to download: PDF
(Original title: Predmety, kauzalita a vedecký realizmus)
Filozofia, 65 (2010), 7, 643-651.
Abstract

There is a growing pessimism about objects based on the view that objects are mysterious unobservables. According to this line of thought objects can disturb our senses or measuring devices only indirectly, via properties or relations – only properties or relations are observables, not the objects per se. As a result, inaccessible objects open a gap between… Read more

File to download: PDF
(Original title: K rozlíšeniu medzi ontológiou a metyfyzikou u E. Lévinasa)
Filozofia, 65 (2010), 7, 652-663.
Abstract

There are several terms in Lévinas’ philosophy, to which his reader better should not assign traditional meanings. The paper focuses on Lévinas’ usage of the terms “ontology” and “metaphysics”, which reveal the philosopher’s attempt to find their new interpretations. In his perspective, both terms become synonyms of the key concepts of his philosophy. In the… Read more

File to download: PDF
(Original title: Niekoľko poznámok k naivnému realizmu, konštruktivizmu a kritickému (vedeckému) realizmu)
Filozofia, 65 (2010), 7, 664-671.
Abstract

The article presents different views of understanding the meanings of historical facts and the nature of historical narratives. It also points to the problems related to understanding of historical work and historical narratives in selected works of the representatives of naîve realism, constructivism and critical realism. It is assumed that Eugen Zeleňák’s… Read more

File to download: PDF